First Ever Study of Unvaccinated Vs. Vaccinated Kids [via]


(Image credit: from
Vaccinating children remains the guardianship decision of parents, but truly informed consent only comes with comprehensive research, evaluation, and study of every conceivable outcome — both positive and negative.

Claire Bernish, The Free Thought Project
Waking Times Media

In recent years, the glaring spotlight of skepticism has been turned to the topic of vaccines, bitterly dividing parents and giving doctors of modern medicine conniption fits — but no matter where you stand on vaccinations, the fact two groundbreaking, scientific, peer-reviewed studies painting inoculations in not-so favorable light have vanished from the Internet is cause for concern.

Originally, the study, titled, “Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children,” was published in Open Access Text.

Until, that is, Open Access Text removed it and a second, similar study by the same authors from their archives without explanation. In fact, The Free Thought Project attempted to contact Open Access Text on multiple occasions for an explanation on the abrupt decision to pull the studies — but, as of publishing, had yet to receive a response.  More at this link:

Comments from Dr. Sundardas D. Annamalay: “When I first saw statistics 19 years ago, they were bad but not as alarming as this report. Incidence of NDD was about 2% not 4.7%. So incidence has gone up by 135%. Significant indeed.”



Explosive: CDC commits new vaccine-autism crime [via]

Bombshell: CDC commits new vaccine-autism crime

CDC won’t allow its own whistleblower to testify in vaccine-damage case

By Jon Rappoport

Here are the bones of the story. For the first time in 30 years, a vaccine-damage case has gone before a court judge. Lawyers for a 16-year-old autistic boy are suing a medical clinic for administering vaccines that brought about the autism. The CDC, of course, denies any connection between vaccines and autism. But one of its own long-time researchers, William Thompson, has publicly confessed to fraud in that area. Thompson states that he and his colleagues concealed research data that would have shown the MMR vaccine and mercury-laden vaccines do cause autism. The lawyers for the 16-year-old boy want to bring in Thompson to testify about what he knows. The CDC has said NO. The head of the CDC, Thomas Frieden, states, “Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS [the Department of Health and Human Services].”

Well, he’s right, because the CDC is the PR arm of the vaccine industry. The CDC is a major purchaser of vaccines for the US federal government. If this boy won his case, other cases would follow. The potential monetary exposure in judgments? A trillion dollars or more. has the details:

“The medical malpractice case seeking Dr. Thompson’s testimony is on behalf of 16-year-old Yates Hazlehurst. The lawsuit alleges that Yates is autistic as a result of vaccine injuries, which occurred when the vaccines were improperly administered in 2001. Because of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986 (VICA), Hazlehurst v. The Jackson Clinic is the only vaccine injury case that has gone to any U.S. court in 30 years.”

“Dr. Thompson wants to reveal the scientific fraud and destruction of evidence that took place in the studies that he co-authored. However, in accordance with the Whistle Blower Protection Act and other federal regulations, Dr. Thompson can not testify under oath without the permission of the director of the CDC, Dr. Thomas Frieden.”

“The request on behalf of Hazlehurst specifically relates to the issue of causation, i.e. the issue of whether vaccines can cause autism, which the State of Tennessee Circuit Court Judge found to be both relevant and a proper basis for seeking the deposition of Dr. Thompson.”

“Judge Acree ordered on Feb. 5 that Dr. Thompson should be deposed. Following Judge’s Acree’s ruling, Smith [Bryan Smith, the boy’s attorney] filed a formal request to CDC to make Thompson available for deposition and trial testimony.”

“On Sept. 22, in a letter from CDC Director Thomas Freiden, CDC denied Smith’s request. Smith explained that ‘this denial was a disappointment but not a surprise, since the inescapable implication of Dr. Thompson’s testimony is that the agency fraudulently altered the science to undermine autism cases worth potentially $1 trillion in compensation ordered by Congress’.”

“Smith and Kennedy [Robert F Kennedy, Jr., the boy’s other attorney] plan to immediately appeal the CDC’s denial to federal court.”

William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, is the subject of the film Vaxxed. Thompson has admitted publicly that he and his CDC colleagues literally threw damning data into a garbage can, to avoid reaching the conclusion, in a 2004 study, that the MMR vaccine raises the risk of autism in children.

His testimony in court would be explosive, to say the least.

Since he is still employed by the CDC, his bosses can keep him out of court. They can muzzle him. They can threaten him. No doubt, Thompson has also signed non-disclosure agreements with the Agency.

How far would the federal government go to silence Thompson, who could open a Pandora’s box containing a trillion dollars in potential judgements? All the way is the obvious answer.

The implications of Thompson’s testimony involve much more than money: the massive destruction of lives through vaccinations. That is ultimately the crime of crimes at the bottom of the cover-up.

And the CDC would be rightly seen as a primary agent in both the crimes and the cover-up.

If the US Department of Justice had any sense of honor, or courage, scores of CDC employees would be in jail right now.

And if major media outlets had any sense of honor, or courage, they would be swarming all over the CDC, hammering on many employees and obtaining confessions from them, releasing the rank truth about vaccines from the Agency’s offices and labs of shame.

British Court Throws Out Conviction of Autism/Vaccine MD [excerpt:]


Image credit: from

Autism Action Network

In a stunning reversal, world renowned pediatric gastroenterologist Prof. John Walker-Smith won his appeal against the United Kingdom’s General Medical Council regulatory board that had ruled against both him and Andrew Wakefield for their roles in the 1998 Lancet MMR paper, which raised questions about a link to autism. The complete victory means that Walker-Smith has been returned to the status of a fully licensed physician in the UK, although he had already retired in 2001 — six years before the GMC trial even began.

Justice John Mitting ruled on the appeal by Walker-Smith, saying that the GMC “panel’s determination cannot stand. I therefore quash it.” He said that its conclusions were based on “inadequate and superficial reasoning and, in a number of instances, a wrong conclusion.” The verdict restores Walker-Smith’s name to the medical register and his reputation to the medical community. This conclusion is not surprising, as the GMC trial had no actual complainants, no harm came to the children who were studied, and parents supported Walker-Smith and Wakefield through the trial, reporting that their children had medically benefited from the treatment they received at the Royal Free Hospital.

Read more at or you can check more of our blog posts on this site:

Is Leaky Gut a Fact…or Fiction?


Leaky gut is very controversial. Gastrointestinal disorder or ‘leaky gut syndrome’ is currently the topic of numerous debates throughout the medical and natural health communities.

About 75% of our entire immune system is located in our gut.

Your gut is essentially outside the body and comes in contact with tons of food, bacteria and chemicals over the course of a lifetime.

Your gut is exposed to an enormous toxic and antigenic load, pretty much day in and day out. It protects our internal organs from this constant assault.

It has very complex and multilevel mechanisms that support one another.

How does it work?

Opening or closure of the tight junctions between enterocytes in the paracellular space is the major determinant of the rate of intestinal permeability. They say that when the fine Zonulin (a gut protein that regulates the openings between the cell walls in the intestine) pathway is deregulated in genetically susceptible individuals, both intestinal and extra intestinal autoimmune, inflammatory, and neoplastic disorders can occur.

Zonulin has been studied in those with and without diseases like celiac disease. And then gliadin activates Zonulin signalling irrespective of the genetic expression of autoimmunity, leading to increased intestinal permeability to macromolecules. Exposure to gluten causes Zonulin to open the walls of the intestine. Zonulin can widen or tighten these openings.

Leaky Gut Syndrome is often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed.

Diagnosing it correctly is the key to recovering from many illnesses.

Leaky gut is a fiction? Some says that leaky gut theory is false. They maintain, it is impossible for large undigested food particles to pass through the many layers of cells into the bloodstream and the gut.

In fact, food allergy tests cannot accurately detect allergenic foods. They also state that any link to autism and diet, specifically “leaky gut” is all “quackery”. There is no solid evidence of the connection between leaky gut and autism. Others say that leaky gut is just a symptom.

There is a new research that shows that leaky gut indeed seems to be a real problem and definitely exist. It is potentially linked to asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, arthritis and other problems.

Do your research and be informed NOW. You need to check for signs that this is happening so that you can prevent any major effects or damage to your body.

Speak with your naturopath now…CLICK HERE